Crum, et al v. State of Alabama, et al

Filing 963

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 962 memorandum opinion enteredtoday, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of thecourt as follows: (1) defs' 925 MOTION to Dismiss is granted; (2) all claims of plfs Herman Alexander Powell, Betty C. Cru m, Louis Gilchrist, Romanza A. Hamilton, Nonie Williams, Ellen Tolbert and Gladys D. Jones are dismissed with prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said plfs are terminated as parties to this action; further ORDERING that the 857 motion to dismi ss the claims of Nonnie Williams is denied as moot; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/21/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION AGAINST THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., EUGENE CRUM, JR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:94cv356-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 925) is granted. (2) All Powell, claims Betty C. of Crum, plaintiffs Louis Herman Gilchrist, Alexander Romanza A. Hamilton, Nonie Williams, Ellen Tolbert, and Gladys D. Jones are dismissed with prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said plaintiffs are terminated as parties to this action. It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the claims of Nonie Williams (doc. no. 857) is denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 21st day of April, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?