Crum, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
Filing
963
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 962 memorandum opinion enteredtoday, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of thecourt as follows: (1) defs' 925 MOTION to Dismiss is granted; (2) all claims of plfs Herman Alexander Powell, Betty C. Cru m, Louis Gilchrist, Romanza A. Hamilton, Nonie Williams, Ellen Tolbert and Gladys D. Jones are dismissed with prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said plfs are terminated as parties to this action; further ORDERING that the 857 motion to dismi ss the claims of Nonnie Williams is denied as moot; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/21/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
IN RE: EMPLOYMENT
DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION
AGAINST THE STATE OF
ALABAMA, et al.,
EUGENE CRUM, JR., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:94cv356-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc.
no. 925)
is granted.
(2) All
Powell,
claims
Betty
C.
of
Crum,
plaintiffs
Louis
Herman
Gilchrist,
Alexander
Romanza
A.
Hamilton, Nonie Williams, Ellen Tolbert, and Gladys D.
Jones are dismissed with prejudice, with costs taxed as
paid, and said plaintiffs are terminated as parties to
this action.
It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss
the claims of Nonie Williams (doc. no. 857) is denied
as moot.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 21st day of April, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?