Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al(INMATE 1)

Filing 7

JUDGMENT overruling 5 objections; adopting 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Woodburck Noe; dismissing this lawsuit without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915; it is further Ordered that costs are taxed againt plai ntiff, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk of the court to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/27/05. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist# 2 plra notice)(vma, )

Download PDF
Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al(INMATE 1) Doc. 7 Case 2:05-cv-01158-MHT-CSC Document 7 Filed 12/27/2005 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION WOODBURCK NOE, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv1158-T (WO) In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's objections (Doc. No. 5) are recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-01158-MHT-CSC Document 7 Filed 12/27/2005 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 27th day of December, 2005. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?