Cooper v. Nichols, et al (INMATE2) CANNOT ACCEPT PLEADINGS WITHOUT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

Filing 12

ORDER denying 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel . Signed by Judge Delores R. Boyd on 5/19/06. (djy, )

Download PDF
Cooper v. Nichols, et al (INMATE2) CANNOT ACCEPT PLEADINGS WITHOUT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE Doc. 12 Case 2:06-cv-00418-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION _______________________________ DAVID COOPER, #7743 Plaintiff, v. D.T. MARSHAL, et al., * * * * 2:06-CV-418-MHT (WO) Defendants. * _______________________________ ORDER ON MOTION P e n d in g before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. No. 7 .) Plaintiff's request for representation has been read, considered, and the same shall be d e n ied . The court finds from its review of the complaint that Plaintiff is able to adequately a rtic u la te the facts and grounds for relief in the instant matter without notable difficulty. F u r th e rm o re , the court concludes that Plaintiff's complaint is not of undue complexity and th a t he has not shown that there are exceptional circumstances justifying appointment of co u n sel. See Killian v. Holt, 166 F.3d 1156, 1157 (11th Cir.1999); Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 1 8 9 , 193 (11th Cir. 1993); see also Fowler v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1088, 1096 (11th Cir. 1990). T h e re fo re , in the exercise of its discretion, the court shall deny Plaintiff's request for a p p o in tm e n t of counsel at this time. The request may be reconsidered if warranted by further d e ve lo p m e n ts in this case. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00418-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 2 of 2 A c co rd in gly , it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (D o c . No. 7), is DENIED. D o n e , this 19 th day of May 2 0 0 6 . /s/ Delores R. Boyd D E LO R E S R. BOYD U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?