Johnson v. Albright et al (INMATE1)
ORDERED that 28 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (3) Costs are TAXED against the plaintiff; and (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 11/20/2009. (cb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION M A R T H A JANE JOHNSON, A IS # 202030, P la in tif f , v. F R A N K ALBRIGHT, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER O n October 29, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. # 28), to which no objections were filed. Upon independent review of the record, and u p o n consideration of the Recommendation, the court agrees that Ms. Johnson's retaliation c la im falters on the causation prong, and that she provides insufficient evidence to survive s u m m a ry judgment on her denial of access to courts claim. Accordingly, it is ORDERED a s follows: (1 ) (2) (3) (4 ) T h e Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED; D e f e n d a n ts' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 16) is GRANTED; c o s ts are TAXED against the plaintiff; and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
C A S E NO. 2:06-CV-546-WKW
D O N E this 20th day of November, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?