Hardy v. Comala Credit Union et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 6

ORDER denying 5 Motion for Appointment of Counsel . Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/25/2006. (cb, )

Download PDF
Hardy v. Comala Credit Union et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 6 Case 2:06-cv-00617-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 07/25/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION O Z Z IE LEE HARDY, #116991, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:06-CV-617-MEF [WO] C O M A L A CREDIT UNION, et al., Defendants. O R D E R ON MOTION T h e plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel on July 24, 2006 (Court Doc. N o . 5). The court notes that the facts underlying the plaintiff's claims for relief are relatively s im p l e and the law applicable to such claims is not complex. The pleadings filed in this case lik e w ise establish that the plaintiff is capable of presenting the necessary elements of his c laim s to this court and fail to demonstrate that there are exceptional circumstances at this tim e which justify appointment of counsel. See Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312, 1320 (11 th C ir. 1999); Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11 th Cir. 1993); Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1 2 1 0 , 1216 (11 th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that the motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 25 th day of July, 2006. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY C H IE F UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?