Wright v. Allen et al (INMATE1)

Filing 6

ORDER denying 1 Motion for Appointment of Counsel . Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/28/2006. (cc, )

Download PDF
Wright v. Allen et al (INMATE1) Doc. 6 Case 2:06-cv-00863-WKW-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FO R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION RICHARD WAYNE WRIGHT, SR., #18714 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-863-WKW ) [W O ] ) RICHARD ALLEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) O RD ER ON MOTION In his complaint, the plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel which the court construes as a motion for appointment of counsel. See Plaintiff's Complaint - Court Doc. No. 1 at 4. The court notes that the facts underlying the plaintiff's claims for relief are relatively simple and the law applicable to such claims is not complex. Moreover, the pleadings filed in this case establish that the plaintiff is capable of presenting the necessary elements of his claims to this court and fail to demonstrate that there are exceptional circumstances justifying appointment of counsel. See Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312, 1320 (11th Cir. 1999); Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993); Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1216 (11th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 28 th day of September, 2006. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY C H IE F UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?