Minnifield v. Bullock County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER ADOPTING 23 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent that Dft seeks dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Bullock County Jail, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a), as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 6/12/2009. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION K E N N E D Y MINNIFIELD, #130651, P la in tif f , v. CURTIS PRITCHARD, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER T h e re being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 23), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the R e c o m m e n d a t io n is adopted and that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is G R A N T E D to the extent that Defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Bullock C o u n ty Jail, and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, in accordance with the p ro v is io n s of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy a v a ila b le to him during his confinement in the Bullock County Jail. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D O N E this 12th day of June, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-1044-WKW[WO]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?