Puckett v. McPhillips Shinbaum, LLP et al
ORDER overruling defendants' 88 Objection; overruling plaintiff's 89 Objections; adopting 87 Report and Recommendations; granting defendants' 57 Second Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/28/2010. (cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION C A R R O L L W. PUCKETT, P la in tiff, v. M C P H IL L IP S SHINBAUM, et al., D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C a s e No. 2:06-CV-1148-ID (W O )
B e fo re the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #87), D e fe n d a n ts ' Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #88), and P la in tiff's Objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #89). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to w h ic h objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED by this court as follows: 1. D e fe n d a n ts ' Objection (Doc. #88) be and the same is hereby O VERRU LED . 2. P la in tiff's Objections (Doc. #89) be and the same are hereby O VERRU LED . 3. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #87) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 4. D e fe n d a n ts ' second motion for summary judgment (Doc. #57) be and the s a m e is hereby GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED with
prejudice. D o n e this the 28th day of April, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?