Watters v. Blanco et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER granting 4 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; to the extent assessment and collection of the filing fee is required under the provisions of 28 USC 1915(b)(1), the court makes no ruling on such matters as the assessment and coll ection of the filing fee should be addressed by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana upon the transfer of this case. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/19/2007. (wcl, )

Download PDF
Watters v. Blanco et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 5 Case 2:07-cv-00197-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 03/19/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY WATTERS, #117621, v. KATHLEEN BLANCO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-197-MHT [WO] ORDER ON MOTION Upon consideration of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by the plaintiff on March 15, 2007 (Court Doc. No. 4), and with respect to that portion of the complaint properly before this court, it is ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. To the extent assessment and collection of the filing fee is required under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), the court makes no ruling on such matters as the assessment and collection of the filing fee should be addressed by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana upon the transfer of this case. Done this 19th day of March, 2007. /s/ Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?