Williams v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2)

Filing 62

ORDER ADOPTING 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Defendants' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies p reviously available to him at the Bullock County Correctional Facility; and this case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies available to him during his confinement at the Bullock County Correctional Facility. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/2/2009. (dmn)

Download PDF
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION R O N N IE V. WILLIAMS # 239 426, P l a i n t if f , v. D R . SIDDIQ, et al. , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 : 0 7 -C V -33 2 -ID WO ORDER O n July 30, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 61) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this c a se and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 61) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h e Defendants' motion for summary judgment be GRANTED to the extent t h e defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to p ro p e rly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the B u llo c k County Correctional Facility; and, 3. T h is case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 4 2 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative re m e d ie s available to him during his confinement at the Bullock County C o rre c tio n a l Facility. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 2 nd day of September, 2009. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?