Ziglar v. United States of America (INMATE3)
ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1. Petitioner's 63 MOTION for Reconsideration filed on 10/20/2009 is DENIED. 2. Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation (Doc. 55 and 58 ) are OVERRULED. 3. The 52 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on 8/18/2009 is ADOPTED; 4. The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Ziglar is DENIED, as the claims therein entitle him to no relief. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/22/2009. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION J O E CARROLL ZIGLAR, P la in tif f , v. U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, D efendant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:07-cv-632-MEF
A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #63) filed on October 20, 2009 is D E N IE D . 2 . Petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation (Doc. #55 & #58) a re OVERRULED. 3 . The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #52) entered o n August 18, 2009 is ADOPTED; 4 . The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Ziglar is DENIED, as the claims therein e n title him to no relief. D O N E this the 22nd day of October, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?