Williams v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Filing 83

ORDER: Petitioner's 81 "Motion to Respond to Report and Recommendation" contains a request for a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing held on 8/3/2009. As Petitioner was advised in a previous 78 Order of this court den ying his request for a transcript, no official transcript of the evidentiary hearing has been generated and Petitioner has not set forth a valid basis establishing his need for a transcript of the hearing. ORDERED that Petitioner's request for a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 9/30/2009. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T I M O T H Y WILLIAMS, P e titio n e r, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R e sp o n d e n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:07cv742-MEF (WO) O R D E R ON MOTION P e tit io n e r 's "Motion to Respond to Report and Recommendation" (Doc. No. 81) c o n ta in s a request for a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing held on August 3, 2 0 0 9 . As Petitioner was advised in a previous Order of this court denying his request for a tra n sc rip t (see Order, Doc. No. 78), no official transcript of the evidentiary hearing has been g e n e ra te d and Petitioner has not set forth a valid basis establishing his need for a transcript o f the hearing. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that Petitioner's request for a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary h e a rin g is DENIED. Done this 30th day of September, 2009. /s/Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?