Sutton v. King (INMATE1)

Filing 16

ORDERED that: (1) The 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) The plaintiff's 14 Objection is OVERRULED; and (3) The case is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, to the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of Alabama. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to take all necessary steps to effectuate said transfer. Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/27/2007. (cb, )

Download PDF
Sutton v. King (INMATE1) Doc. 16 Case 2:07-cv-00776-WKW-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONALD SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. TROY KING, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 12) that this case is due to be transferred to the Northern District of Alabama. Recommendation. (Doc. # 14.) After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court, for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, that: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 12) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 14) is OVERRULED; 3. The case is TRANSFERRED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404, to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to take all necessary steps to effectuate said transfer. DONE this 27th day of November, 2007. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiff filed an objection to the Case No. 2:07-cv-0776-WKW Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?