Le et al v. ArciTerra Group, LLC

Filing 7

ORDER denying 1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/12/07. (sl, )

Download PDF
Le et al v. ArciTerra Group, LLC Doc. 7 Case 2:07-cv-01070-WKW-CSC Document 7 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T H U Y TRONG LE, et al., P l a i n t if f s , v. A R C IT E R R A GROUP, LLC, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER B e f o re the court is the Verified Complaint and Motion for Temporary Restraining O rd e r (Doc. # 1) filed by plaintiffs Thuy Trong Le and Kim Chi Vo d/b/a Nail Studio and S p a . The motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 (b) states that a temporary restraining order may b e granted only if "it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified c o m p la in t that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant b e f o re the adverse party . . . can be heard in opposition." "An injury is `irreparable' only if it cannot be undone through monetary remedies." Ferrero v. Associated Materials, Inc., 923 F .2 d 1441, 1449 (11th Cir.1991) (quoting Cate v. Oldham, 707 F.2d 1176, 1189 (11th C ir .1 9 8 3 )) . The court finds the plaintiff fails to demonstrate that an immediate and irreparable in ju ry will occur before a hearing on the preliminary injunction can be held. In the present c a s e , plaintiffs have not offered evidence that they will suffer any harm beyond monetary loss C A S E NO. 2:07-cv-1070-WKW (WO) Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-01070-WKW-CSC Document 7 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 if the temporary restraining order is not issued. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that p la in tif f s ' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 1) is DENIED. D O N E this 12th day of December, 2007. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?