Crumpton v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Filing 16

ORDER; No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 9 , entered on September 14, 2010, and after an independent and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioners § 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSEDwith prejudice as the claims do not entitle him to any relief. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/5/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALPHONSE CRUMPTON, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv433-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9), entered on September 14, 2010, and after an independent and de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is adopted, and it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as the claims do not entitle him to any relief. Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 5th day October, 2010. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?