Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery

Filing 56

FINAL JUDGMENT as follows: (1) With respect to all remaining claims in this action judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant against Gary Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs, with them taking nothing by their claims; (2) Costs are TAXED in favor of De fendant against Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs for which execution may issue; and (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/7/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION G A R Y CREMEENS, P L A IN T IF F , v. C IT Y OF MONTGOMERY, D EFEN D A N T. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:08-cv-546-MEF (W O ) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, it is the O R D E R , JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court as follows: (1 ) With respect to all remaining claims in this action judgment is ENTERED in favor o f Defendant against Gary Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs, with them taking nothing by th e ir claims. (2) Costs are TAXED in favor of Defendant against Cremeens and the opt-in plaintiffs f o r which execution may issue. (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket s h e e t as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. DONE this the 7 th day of October, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?