Gay v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1)
ORDERING and ADJUDGING that the 62 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) The 41 motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants is GRANTED; (2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants; (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 6/1/10. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION C H R IS T O P H E R DANIEL GAY, #253514, P l a in tif f , v. J A M E S DELOACH, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:08cv561-TMH
O R D E R AND OPINION O n May 5, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 62). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. 2. 3. 4. T h e motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants is GRANTED. J u d g m e n t is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. T h is case is DISMISSED with prejudice. T h e costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution m a y issue.
D o n e this the 1 st day of June, 2010.
/s / Truman M. Hobbs _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________ S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?