Edwards v. Peasant (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing that: 1) The 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Dft's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED to the extent Dfts seeks dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to properly exhaust available administrative remedies; and 3) This case be DISMISSED with prejudice, as further set out in order; An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 12/30/2008. (wcl, )
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION M IC H A E L LYNN EDWARDS, #249580, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:08-CV-564-TMH [W O ]
D R . PEASANT, Defendant.
O n December 10, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 17) in th is case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the f ile in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 17) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; D e f e n d a n t's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 12) be GRANTED to the e x ten t Defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to p ro p e rly exhaust available administrative remedies; and 3. T h is case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 4 2 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies a v a ila b le to him during his confinement at the Ventress Correctional Facility.
A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 30th day of December, 2008.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?