Dobbins v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
OPINION directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's 116 recommendation should be adopted; an appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/20/11. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM GEOFFERY DOBBINS,
J.C. GILES, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff William
taken against him by defendants J.C. Giles, Lewis Hulett,
Antonio McClain, Dorothy Starks, Robert Bryant, Richard
This lawsuit is now before the court
on the recommendation of the United states Magistrate
Judge that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment
should be granted in all respects, except as to Dobbins’s
excessive-force claim against Hulett in his individual
should go to trial.
There are no objections to the
After an independent and de novo review
of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate
judge’s recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 20th day of June, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?