Dobbins v. Giles et al (INMATE1)

Filing 117

OPINION directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's 116 recommendation should be adopted; an appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/20/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM GEOFFERY DOBBINS, Plaintiff, v. J.C. GILES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv581-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff William Geoffery Dobbins, a lawsuit challenging former the state inmate, constitutionality filed of this actions taken against him by defendants J.C. Giles, Lewis Hulett, Antonio McClain, Dorothy Starks, Robert Bryant, Richard Allen, John Peasant, Medical Services. Nettie Burks, and Correctional This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United states Magistrate Judge that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should be granted in all respects, except as to Dobbins’s excessive-force claim against Hulett in his individual capacity, which, according should go to trial. recommendation. to the magistrate judge, There are no objections to the After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 20th day of June, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?