Smith v. Hamilton et al (INMATE2)

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Adams is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Defendant Adams is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint. Plaintiff's request to be released from detention and/or have all charges dismissed against him is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and this case, with respect to the remaining defendants, is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/9/2008. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREAS J. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JOHN C. HAMILTON (AKA J.C.), et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-642-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) ORDER On August 19, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #7) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Recommendation (Doc. #7) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Adams is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. 4. Defendant Adams is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; Plaintiff's request to be released from detention and/or have all charges dismissed against him is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. This case, with respect to the remaining defendants, is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Done this the 9th day of September, 2008. 28 U.S.C. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?