Jemison v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
ORDER directing as follows: 1) The petitioner's 20 MOTION to Stay the Proceedings on his 2255 motion is GRANTED and this court's determination of the issues presented in the 2255 motion is held in abeyance; 2) The government shall file wi th this court a report of the status of the petitioner's criminal case and his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 USC 3582(c)(2), beginning 2/2/2009, and every 30 days thereafter; Status Report due by 2/2/2009. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 1/22/2009. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION J A M E S JEMISON, JR., P e titio n e r, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R e sp o n d e n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 2:08cv714-WHA (WO)
ORDER T h e petitioner has filed a motion requesting that this court stay the proceedings on his m o tio n filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 pending a determination of his motion for a re d u c tio n of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the amended crack cocaine s e n te n c i n g guidelines. (Doc. No. 20.) The government has indicated that it does not oppose th e petitioner's motion to stay the proceedings on his § 2255 motion. (Doc. No. 21.) A c c o r d in g ly, and for good cause, it is ORDERED as follows: 1 . The petitioner's motion to stay the proceedings on his § 2255 motion (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED and this court's determination of the issues presented in the § 2255 motion is h e ld in abeyance. 2 . The government shall file with this court a report on the status of the petitioner's c rim in a l case and his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2),
b eg inn ing February 2, 2009, and every 30 days thereafter. D o n e this 22 n d day of January, 2009.
/s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?