T.P.R. v. Montgomery Public Schools et al(MAG+)
ORDER; 1. The objections 44 are OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation 43 is ADOPTED; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 6/17/2010. (jg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T .P .R ., by and though his parent, D O N N A PATTERSON-RUDOLPH, P la in tif f , v. MONTGOMERY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, e t al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:08cv813-WKW
ORDER O n May 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case. (Doc. # 43.) On June 9, 2010, Plaintiff T.P.R., "by and through his parent Donna PattersonR a n d o lp h ," filed objections on June 9, 2010. (Doc. # 44.) Upon an independent and de novo re v ie w of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the objection lacks merit for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's R e c o m m e n d a tio n .1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. T h e objections (Doc. # 44) are OVERRULED. T h e Recommendation (Doc. # 43) is ADOPTED.
The objections mirror the arguments made by Plaintiff in response to the Magistrate Judge's show cause Order entered on April 28, 2010 (Doc. # 41). The argument that the statute of limitations would have expired if Ms. Patterson-Randolph had not filed this action on behalf of her minor son is incorrect. (Doc. # 44, at 2.) As previously noted by the Magistrate Judge, "under Alabama law, the statute of limitations is tolled until a minor reaches the age of majority, 19." (Doc. # 40, at 1.)
T h is action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D O N E this 17th day of June, 2010.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?