Williams v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (MAG+)
ORDERED that: (1) The 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution; (3) The 6 Motion to Dismiss and Montgomery County Board of Education's 8 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED as moot; and (4) Any other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/24/2009. (cb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION B R IA N WILLIAMS, P l a in tif f , v. M O N T G O M E R Y COUNTY BOARD OF E D U C A T IO N , et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:08-cv-0847-MEF
O n February 5, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #13) in th is case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the f ile in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the O R D E R , JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2 . This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. 3 . The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) and Montgomery County Board of Education's M o tio n to Dismiss (Doc. #8) are DENIED as moot. 4 . Any other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. D O N E this the 24th day of February, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?