Hawes v. Bowden et al (INMATE2)

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge directing as follows: (a) the 31 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (b) Defendant's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED to the extent Defendant seeks dismissal of thi s case due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Elmore County Jail; and (c) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Elmore County Jail. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 3/8/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
Hawes v. Bowden et al (INMATE2) Doc. 32 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER P. HAWES, #258240, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #31) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: a. b. the Recommendation (Doc. #31) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #16) is GRANTED to the extent Defendant seeks dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Elmore County Jail; and c. this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a), due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust CASE NO. 2:08-cv-0930-TMH TRACEY M. BOWDEN, Defendant. Dockets.Justia.com administrative remedies previously available to him at the Elmore County Jail. A separate judgment shall issue. Done this 8 th day of March, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?