Canal Insurance Company v. Fenn et al

Filing 89

ORDERED to file a proper Report of Parties' Planning Meeting as previously ordered no later than July 8, 2010 as further set out. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/2/2010. (cb, )

Download PDF
Canal Insurance Company v. Fenn et al Doc. 89 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION C A N A L INSURANCE COMPANY, P L A IN T IF F , v. A N N E T T E FENN, et al., D EFEN D A N TS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:08-cv-957-MEF (W O ) ORDER B y its Order (Doc. # 86) dated March 26, 2010, the Court reminded the parties of the o b lig a tio n , imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to d e v e lo p a proposed discovery plan and directed to file the Report of Parties' Planning M e e tin g described in Rule 26(f) as soon as practicable but not later than April 23, 2010. As o f the date of this Order, the Court has not received the Report of Parties' Planning. The p a rtie s are hereby ORDERED to file a proper Report of Parties' Planning Meeting as p re v io u s ly ordered no later than July 8, 2010. The parties are admonished that failure to c o m p ly with this Order could result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. It is not a c c e p ta b le behavior to ignore deadlines the Court imposes. In preparing the Report of Parties' Planning Meeting, the parties are advised that the lo n g s ta n d in g practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 d a ys prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should p re s e n t, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance. This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's re g u la rly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six w e e k s of a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on th e court's website located at in the civil case information section. T h is court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling o rd e r. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling c o n f e re n c e by conference call. T h e scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform S c h e d u lin g Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also a v a ila b le on the court's website. T h e report of the parties should comply with Form 52 of the Appendix of Forms to th e Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. D O N E this the 2n d day of July, 2010. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?