Bullock v. Bates et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 22

ORDERED that the 5 Report and Recommendation is adopted and that: 1) Plf's claims against the Montgomery County Commissioners be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii i); 2) The Montgomery County Commissioners be DISMISSED as dfts to this cause of action; and 3) This case with respect to Plf's claims against the remaining dfts be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 1/7/2009. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION J A M E S TIMOTHY BULLOCK, P lai n tiff, v. D R . BATES OF Q.C.H.C., et al., D e fe n d a n t s . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER T h er e being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5), and upon an independent review of the file, it is ORDERED that the Report and R eco mm en d atio n is adopted and that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against the Montgomery County Commissioners be D I S M IS S E D with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the p ro v isio n s of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 2. The Montgomery County Commissioners be DISMISSED as defendants to this cau s e of action; and 3. This case with respect to Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be r efer red back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. D o n e this 7th day of January 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE C A S E NO. 2:08-CV-977-WKW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?