Moore v. Dinnerman et al (INMATE2)
ORDER ADOPTING 3 Report and Recommendations, that the Court finds that Plaintiff is subject to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED without prejudice due to his failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 1/28/2009. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION H O S E A R. MOORE, #201 099, P la in tif f , v. DR. WILLIAM DINNERMAN, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 2:09cv3-TMH
T h e Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #3) in this case to which no tim e ly objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION (Doc. #3) of the Magistrate Judge is A D O P T E D . The Court finds that Plaintiff is subject to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U .S .C . § 1915(g). Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is D IS M IS S E D without prejudice due to his failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation o f this case. An appropriate judgment will enter. Done this 28th day of January, 2009. /s / Truman M. Hobbs U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?