Givan v. Jones et al (INMATE3)
ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; (2) the 28 USC 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief by petitioner be DENIED, as petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 USC 2254(d)(1)(A); and (3) this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 12/14/10. (djy, )
G i v a n v. Jones et al (INMATE3)
D o c . 11
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION S A Q U A S K I MARKESE GIVAN, #244725, Petitioner, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-CV-15-TMH [W O ]
K E N N E T H JONES, et al., Respondents.
O n October 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 1 0 ) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review o f the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Ju d g e , it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 10) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h is 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner be D E N IE D , as Petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of lim ita tio n set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1)(A); and 3. T h is case be DISMISSED with prejudice. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 14th day of December, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?