Henley v. McGriff et al (INMATE2)
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Richard Henley; it is Ordered that Document Number 1 filed in the instant action is considered an amended complaint which Plaintiff intended to file in Civil Action No. 2:08cv 1004-WKW, Henley v. Ala. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles, et al; Based on the foregoing, it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that the instant complaint be dismissed without prejudice; The Clerk is directed to make a copy of the complaint filed in th e instant action, file the copy of said pleading in Civil Action No. 2:08cv1004-WKW, and docket said pleading as an amendment in that case; The Clerk is further directed to file a copy of this order in Civil Action No. 2:08cv1004-WKW Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 1/26/09. (vma, )
. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION _____________________________ R IC H A R D HENLEY, #123 127, P l a in tif f , v. S E V E N MCGRIFF, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . _____________________________ * * * * * 2:09-CV-55-WHA (WO)
O R D E R AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE T h e above-captioned action was filed on January 22, 2009. Plaintiff challenges m atters associated with the parole consideration process. After reviewing Plaintiff's
c o m p la in t, the undersigned is persuaded that Plaintiff is actually attempting to amend a c o m p la in t he previously filed with the court on December 19, 2008 as he was directed to do b y order entered January 9, 2009. See Henley v. Ala. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles, et al., C iv il Action No. 2:08-CV-1004-WKW (Doc. No. 6). The subject matter of the instant action is identical to the subject matter in Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-1008-WKW. In light of the foregoing, the court finds it appropriate to recommend that the instant c o m p la in t be dismissed. The court will also direct the Clerk to docket Plaintiff's January 22, 2 0 0 9 complaint as an amended complaint in Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-1004-WKW. A c c o r d in g ly, it is
O R D E R E D that Document Number 1 filed in the instant action is CONSIDERED a n amended complaint which Plaintiff intended to file in Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-1004W K W , Henley v. Ala. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles, et al. B a se d on the foregoing, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that th e instant complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to make a copy of the complaint filed in the instant action, f ile the copy of said pleading in Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-1004-WKW, and docket said p lea d in g as an amendment in that case. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to file a copy of this o rd e r in Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-1004-WKW. It is further O R D E R E D that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the R e c o m m e n d a tio n on or before February 9, 2009. Any objections filed must specifically id e n tif y the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects. F r iv o lo u s , conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The p a rtie s are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable. F a ilu re to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the M a g is tra te Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District C o u rt of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual f in d in g s in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain
e r r o r or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 th Cir. 1982). See Stein v . Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of P r ic h a r d , 661 F.2d 1206 (11 th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the d e c is io n s of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on S e p te m b e r 30, 1981. D o n e , this 26 r d day of January 2009.
/s/ Wallace Capel,Jr. WALLACE CAPEL, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?