Johnson v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The plf's 67 Objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 62 Recommendation is adopted; (3) Dfts' motion for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 34 , 56 & 57 ) is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of dfts and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/21/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON,
J.C. GILES, Warden,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 67) are
recommendation (Doc. No. 62) is adopted.
(3) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc.
Nos. 34, 56 & 57) is granted.
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing
by his complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 21st day of September, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?