Santos v. Lohman (INMATE 2)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that this case be dismissed without prejudice. Ojections to R&R due by 3/25/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 3/13/2009. (cb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION _____________________________ N E D O L A N D E Z LEON SANTOS, # 1 4 0 896 P l a in tif f , v. M A R K LOHMAN, D e f e n d a n t. _____________________________ * * * * * 2:09-CV-167-TMH (WO)
R E C O M M E N D A T I O N OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE P la in tif f filed this complaint on March 2, 2009. On March 11, 2009 he filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. No. 3.) Upon review of the file in this case, the court c o n c lu d e s that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is due to be granted. Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff's m o tio n to dismiss be GRANTED and that this case be dismissed without prejudice. It is further O R D E R E D that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the R e c o m m e n d a tio n on or before March 25, 2009. Any objections filed must specifically id e n tif y the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects. F r iv o lo u s , conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The p a rtie s are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable.
F a ilu re to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the M a g is tra te Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District C o u rt of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual f in d in g s in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain e r r o r or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 th Cir. 1982). See Stein v . Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of P r ic h a r d , 661 F.2d 1206 (11 th Cir. 1981) (en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the d e c is io n s of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on S e p te m b e r 30, 1981. D o n e , this 13 th day of March 2009.
/s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?