Bullard v. Giles et al (INMATE2)

Filing 23

ORDER; that there being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed herein on March 17, 2010 22 , and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:1. The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge 22 be ADOPTED; 2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner on January 1, 2009, be DENIED; and, 3. This cause of action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 4/7/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION H A R O L D DOUGLAS BULLARD, # 2 2 5 596 Petitioner, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-183-TMH [W O ] J .C . GILES, et al., Respondents. ORDER T h e re being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed h e re in on March 17, 2010 (Doc. 22), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 22) be ADOPTED; T h e 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner on J a n u a ry 1, 2009, be DENIED; and, 3. T h is cause of action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as tim e -b a rre d . D o n e this 7th day of April, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?