Bullard v. Giles et al (INMATE2)

Filing 23

ORDER; that there being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed herein on March 17, 2010 22 , and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:1. The Recommendation of t he Magistrate Judge 22 be ADOPTED; 2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner on January 1, 2009, be DENIED; and, 3. This cause of action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 4/7/2010. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION H A R O L D DOUGLAS BULLARD, # 2 2 5 596 Petitioner, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-183-TMH [W O ]

J .C . GILES, et al., Respondents.

ORDER
T h e re being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed h e re in on March 17, 2010 (Doc. 22), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 22) be ADOPTED; T h e 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner on J a n u a ry 1, 2009, be DENIED; and, 3. T h is cause of action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as tim e -b a rre d . D o n e this 7th day of April, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE