Taylor v. Hartzog (MAG+)

Filing 6

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and that these cases are dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(d) and (e)(2)(B)(i); An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/24/2009. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RICKY LEE TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JEAN HARTZOG, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CALLIE HEATH, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GEORGE PARHAM, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ RICKY LEE TAYLOR, RICKY LEE TAYLOR, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv194-MHT (LEAD CASE) (WO) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv195-MHT CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv196-MHT RICKY LEE TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOHNA COTTON, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ RICKY LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MARSHALL WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv197-MHT CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv198-MHT ORDER This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on March 26, 2009 (Doc. # 5), that these cases be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and (e)(2)(B)(i). After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the recommendation of the magistrate judge is adopted and that these cases are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and (e)(2)(B)(i). An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 24th Day of April, 2009. /s / Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?