Farr v. Price et al (INMATE2)

Filing 34

ORDER and OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 29 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 USC § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief be DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/8/2011. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LON LAMAR FARR, Petitioner, v. CHERYL PRICE, et al., Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-cv-394-WHA [wo] OPINION and ORDER On October 17, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case (Doc. No. 29) and after an extension of time was granted in which Petitioner was granted until November 21, 2011, (Doc. No. 31) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief be DENIED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. DONE this 8th day of December, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?