Walker v. Dinkins et al (INMATE2)
ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations; that Plaintiff's complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), due to Plaintiff's failure to allege a constitutional violation. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/17/2009. (cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION L O R E N Z O E. WALKER, #164 121, P l a in tif f , v. C .O . T. DINKINS, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO.: 2:09-cv-423-TMH
ORDER T h e Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #6) in this case to which no t i m e ly objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION (Doc. #6) of the Magistrate Judge is A D O P T E D . Plaintiff's complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice, p u rs u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), due to Plaintiff's failure to allege a constitutional v io la tio n . An appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 17 th day of September, 2009. /s / Truman M. Hobbs U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?