Duff v. Daniels (INMATE2)

Filing 23

OPINION and ORDER; that 1. That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the Defendants motion for summary judgment 11 be and is hereby GRANTED. 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 6/16/2011. (jg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTONIO RODREGIS DUFF, #186551,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN DANIELS,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv523-ID
)
)
)
)

OPINION and ORDER
On May 26, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 22). Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.

That the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED;

2.

That the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11) be and is

hereby GRANTED.
3.

That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

4.

That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the Plaintiff for which execution

may issue.
Done this the 16 th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE