Easterling v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
ORDERED that (1) the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) this case is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to properly prosecute this action. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/17/09. (sl, )
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION D A R R E N LLOYD EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-CV-566-TMH [W O ]
K E V IN DAVIS, et al., Defendants.
O n July 2, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 7) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this c a se and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 7) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h is case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to properly p ro s e c u te this action. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 17 th day of September, 2009. /s / Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?