Jackson v. U.S. House of Representatives et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and inability to recover his requested relief from the named defendants. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/10/2009. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION M Y R O N J. JACKSON, P la in tif f , v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF R E P R E S E N T A T IV E S , et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-CV-631-MEF ORDER T h e Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #4) in this case to which no tim e ly objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) is adopted. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon w h ic h relief may be granted and inability to recover his requested relief from the named d e f e n d a n ts . DONE this the 10th day of September, 2009. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?