Shultz v. R. Brian Wells, D.C., et al

Filing 42

ORDER overruling the 40 Objections of the plaintiff; adopting the 38 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; granting the 10 defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment; taxing costs against the plaintiff; dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 3/22/2010. (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION M IR IA M CLARE SHULTZ, D.C. v. R. BRYAN WELLS, et al., ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:09-CV-646-WKW ORDER O n March 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case. (Doc. # 38.) Plaintiff Miriam Clare Shultz filed objections to the Recommendation on March 19, 2 0 1 0 . (Doc. # 40). Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the R e c o m m e n d a tio n to which objections were made, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), it is ORDERED a s follows: 1. 2. 3. M s . Shultz's objections (Doc. # 40) are OVERRULED; th e Recommendation (Doc. # 38) is ADOPTED; D e f e n d a n ts' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment (D o c . # 10), is GRANTED as set forth in the Recommendation; 4. 5. c o s ts are TAXED against the plaintiff; and th is case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 22nd day of March, 2010. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?