Dorsey v. Meeks et al
ORDER directing that (1) the plf's 11 objection to the recommendation of the Mag Judge is OVERRULED; (2) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge 1 0 is ADOPTED; (3) the 1983 claims against Judge McGuire are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii); (4) the claims against def Meeks are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and (5) the complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/4/09. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION L E O N A R D E. DORSEY, P la in tiff, v. S H E R IF F DENNIS MEEKS, et al., D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:09-CV-654-ID (W O )
A fte r an independent review of the file, it is hereby CONSIDERED and ORDERED th a t: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #11) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on August 21, 2009, is OVERRULED; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10) filed on August 14, 2 0 0 9 , is ADOPTED; 3 . The § 1983 claims against Judge McGuire are DISMISSED with prejudice in a c c o rd a n c e with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii); 4 . The claims against Defendant Meeks are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);1 and 5 . The Complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. DONE this 4th day of September, 2009. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A dismissal "without prejudice" is a "dismissal that does not bar the plaintiff from refiling the lawsuit within the applicable limitations period." Black's Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?