Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE1)
ORDER that 5 motion for indigency treatment filed by the plaintiff in which he seeks leave to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees is denied in accordance with the reasoning set forth in 3 Order and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 8/6/2009. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WOODBURCK NOE, #148475, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for indigency treatment filed by the plaintiff on August 5, 2009 (Court Doc. No. 5), in which the plaintiff seeks leave to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees, and in accordance with the reasoning set forth in the Order and Recommendation entered on July 28, 2009 (Court Doc. No. 3), it is ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 6th day of August, 2009.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-692-WHA [WO]
/s/ Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?