Williams v. GE Money Bank et al
Filing
39
JUDGMENT that plaintiff Douglas M. Williams's 37 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice is granted and that defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and the claims against it are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own co sts, attorneys' fees, and expenses; that any objection must be filed within seven days from the date of this order; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; that this case is now closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 8/9/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, ) Deadlines terminated: 08/20/2010 Pretrial and 09/20/2010 Jury Trial
Williams v. GE Money Bank et al
Doc. 39
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. GE MONEY BANK, a foreign corporation, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv718-MHT (WO)
JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that plaintiff Douglas M. Williams's motion to dismiss with prejudice (doc. no. 37) is granted and that
defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and the
claims against it are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses. The court assumes that defendant Experian
Information Solutions, Inc., has no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if it does, it must file the objection within seven days from the date of this order.
Dockets.Justia.com
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is now closed. DONE, this the 9th day of August, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?