Holloway v. United States of America (INMATE3)
AMENDED ORDER as follows: (1) the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) Ms. Holloway's Section 2255 petition is granted; (3) the judgment of conviction and sentence entered in case no. 2:08CR62 (Doc. 24 in that case) are vac ated; and (4) the Clerk of Court shall file, in case 2:08CR62 copies of this Amended Order and the accompanying Final Judgment along with the Magistrate Judge's 7 Recommendation. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/26/09. (sl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T A M M Y HOLLOWAY, P e titio n e r, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R e s p o n d e n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:09-CV-760-WKW
A M E N D E D ORDER T h is Amended Order VACATES the court's previous Order. (Doc. # 10.) O n August 11, 2009, Petitioner Tammy Holloway filed a petition (Doc. # 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence she received on O c to b e r 29, 2008, in criminal case number 2:08-CR-62. The basis for Ms. Holloway's p e titio n is the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 129 S . Ct. 1886, 1888 (2009), which interpreted the aggravated identify theft statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, in a manner contrary to the interpretation of the Eleventh Circuit at the time of Ms. H o llo w a y's sentencing. Ms. Holloway argues, and the Government concedes (Doc. # 6), that h e r conduct would have been insufficient to sustain a conviction under that statute were she b e in g prosecuted today. The Government filed this concession in response to the order (Doc. # 3) of the Magistrate Judge; the Magistrate Judge then filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) th a t Ms. Holloway's petition be granted and she be re-sentenced. The court was unclear as
to the basis for the Government's concession, and so ordered (Doc. # 8) a fuller explanation, w h ic h the Government provided (Doc. # 9). U p o n consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that: (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED; M s . Holloway's Section 2255 petition (Doc. # 1) is GRANTED; T h e judgment of conviction and sentence entered in case no. 2:08-CR-62 (Doc.
# 24 in that case) are VACATED, and; (4 ) T h e Clerk of the Court shall file, in case 2:08-CR-62, copies of this Amended
O rd e r and the accompanying Final Judgment, along with the Magistrate Judge's re c o m m e n d a tio n (Doc. # 7). A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D O N E this 26th day of October, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?