Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Dapper, LLC

Filing 32

FINAL JUDGMENT, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plf Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company and against Dft Dapper, LLC; (2) It is declared that there is no coverage available under Harleysville Comm ercial General Liability Policy MPA 2J9198 or Harleysville Commercial Umbrella Liability Policy BE 2J9198 for the claims against Dapper, LLC in Fantail, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, Shital Desai,and Dapper LLC, Civil ActionNumber CV-2008-358, currently pend ing in the Circuit Court for Elmore County; (3) It is declared that Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company has no duty orobligation to defend or indemnify Dapper, LLC under Harleysville Commercial General Liability Policy MPA 2J9198 or Harleysville Co mmercial Umbrella Liability Policy BE 2J9198 in Fantail, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, ShitalDesai, and Dapper LLC, Civil Action Number CV-2008-358; (4) It is declared that Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company has satisfied its obligations under the subject policies with regard to the claims brought against Dapper, LLC in Fantail, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, Shital Desai, and Dapper LLC, Civil Action Number CV-2008-358; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against Dft Dapper, LLC for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 7/21/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Dapper, LLC (CONSENT) Doc. 32 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION H A R L E Y S V IL L E MUTUAL IN S U R A N C E COMPANY P la in tif f , v. D A P P E R , LLC, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:09-cv-794-TFM [w o] F I N A L JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of this Court, it is the O R D E R E D , ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1 ) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance C o m p a n y and against Defendant Dapper, LLC. (2) It is declared that there is no coverage available under Harleysville C om m e rc ia l General Liability Policy MPA 2J9198 or Harleysville Commercial U m b re lla Liability Policy BE 2J9198 for the claims against Dapper, LLC in F a n ta il, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, Shital Desai,and Dapper LLC, Civil Action N u m b e r CV-2008-358, currently pending in the Circuit Court for Elmore C o u n t y. (3 ) It is declared that Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company has no duty or o b lig a tio n to defend or indemnify Dapper, LLC under Harleysville Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com Commercial General Liability Policy MPA 2J9198 or Harleysville Commercial U m b re lla Liability Policy BE 2J9198 in Fantail, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, Shital D e s a i,a n d Dapper LLC, Civil Action Number CV-2008-358. (4 ) It is declared that Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company has satisfied its o b lig a tio n s under the subject policies with regard to the claims brought against D a p p e r, LLC in Fantail, Inc. v. Kishor Desai, Shital Desai,and Dapper LLC, C iv il Action Number CV-2008-358. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against Defendant Dapper, LLC for w h ic h execution may issue. T h e Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a f in a l judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 21st day of July, 2010. /s/ Terry F. Moorer T E R R Y F. MOORER U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?