Granger v. Meredith (INMATE 1)

Filing 7

ORDER directing that the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; further ORDERED as follows: (1) To the extent Plaintiff asserts claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, his complaint is DISMISSED, as this Court lacks subject matter j urisdiction over such claims because of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) To the extent the complaint asserts any related state law claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such state law claims and, accordingly, such claims are DISMISSED; a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/14/10. (scn, )

G r a n g e r v. Meredith (INMATE 3)

Doc. 7

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BOBBY RAY GRANGER, #166643, P la in ti ff , v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O RDER
T h e Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #6) in this case to which no tim e ly objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION (Doc. #6) of the Magistrate Judge is A D O P T E D . It is further O R D E R E D as follows: 1. T o the extent Plaintiff asserts claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, his c o m p l a in t is DISMISSED, as this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over s u c h claims because of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and 2. T o the extent the complaint asserts any related state law claims, the Court

CASE NO. 2:09-cv-931-TMH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Dockets.Justia.com

d e c lin e s to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such state law claims and, a c c o rd in g ly, such claims are DISMISSED. A separate judgment shall issue. D o n e this 14th day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2