Brinson v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 45

ORDER as follows: 1. That Plaintiff's 39 Objections are hereby OVERRULED. 2. That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. That this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/29/2010. (dmn)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALEXANDER BRINSON, #146986, Plaintiff, v. DR. DARBOUZE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 2:09-cv-1022-ID (WO)

ORDER
B e fo re the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #3) and P la in tiff Alexander Brinson's Objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (D o c . #39). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the

R e c o m m e n d a tio n of the Magistrate Judge to which objection is made, it is CONSIDERED a n d ORDERED as follows: 1. T h a t Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #39) be and the same are hereby O VERRU LED . 2. T h a t the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #3) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. T h a t this action be and the same is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Done this the 29th day of April, 2010.

1

/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2