American Indoor Football Association, Inc. v. Lockwood et al
Filing
10
ORDERED to file a memorandum, on or before April 28, 2010, that explains the above-described delay in filing the motion for extension as further set out. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/21/2010. (cb, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION AMERICAN INDOOR FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KELLY LOCKWOOD, ) individually, and NJ KINGS, ) LLC, a New Jersey Limited ) Liability Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On Football November 10, 2009, Inc. plaintiff (AIFA) American the Indoor instant
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv1037-MHT (WO)
Association,
filed
lawsuit in this court. motion for extension
On April 20, 2010, AIFA filed a of time to perfect service on
defendant Kelly Lockwood.
The motion and accompanying
affidavit allege failed attempts to serve Lockwood up to and including an attempt on January 24, 2010. However,
AIFA provides no explanation for its decision to wait nearly three months after that final attempt to request an extension of time. More importantly, AIFA provides no
explanation for its decision to wait more than five months after this lawsuit was filed, and more than a month after to the 120-day-time said limit for service Finally, had and
expired,
request
extension.
relatedly, AIFA makes no attempt to explain why this court should grant a motion for extension filed after the expiration of the 120-day-time limit. Accordingly, plaintiff American Indoor Football
Association, Inc. is ORDERED to file a memorandum, on or before April 28, 2010, that explains the above-described delay in filing the motion for extension. Specifically,
the memorandum should explain why the court should grant a motion for extension filed after the expiration of the 120-day-time limit for service of process. DONE, this the 21st day April, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?