Franklin v. The Healthcare Authority for Baptist Health et al (MAG+)

Filing 74

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plf's 68 objection is overruled; (2) the 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) the defs' 33 motion to dismiss the Montgomery Police Department as a def is g ranted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); (4) the plf's kidnapping claim is DISMISSED as frivolous in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (5) the defs' 16 , 23 , & 33 motions to dismiss the remaining fed eral claims, including the RICO, § 1985, and HIPAA claims, with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; (6) the plf's supplemental state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/12/10. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION N U E CHEER FRANKLIN, ) ) P la in tif f , ) v. ) ) T H E HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY FOR ) B A P T IS T HEALTH, et al.,, ) ) D e f e n d a n ts. ) C A S E NO. 2:09-cv-1075-MEF WO ORDER A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #68) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on May 11, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #65) filed on April 15, 2010 is adopted; 3. The defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. #33-2) the Montgomery Police D e p a rtm e n t as a defendant is GRANTED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 4. The plaintiff's kidnapping claim is DISMISSED as frivolous in accordance with th e provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 5 . The defendants' motions to dismiss the remaining federal claims, including the R IC O , § 1985, and HIPAA claims, with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is G R A N T E D (Doc. #16, #23, & #33-2). 6. The plaintiff's supplemental state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. D O N E this the 12 day of August, 2010. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE th 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?