Bell et al v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
ORDERED that: (1) The plaintiff's 21 Objection to 16 Report and Recommendations, is overruled; (2) The 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) That plaintiff's challenge to the revocation of his probation is DISMISSE D without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and (4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/24/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION D A R R IU S BRYANT BELL, #149992, P la in tif f , v. J A M E S EDWARD SPENCER, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:09-cv-1076-MEF WO
A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #21) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on February 16, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16) entered on January 25, 2 0 1 0 is adopted; 3 . That plaintiff's challenge to the revocation of his probation is DISMISSED without p re ju d ic e in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 4 . This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. D O N E this the 24th day of February, 2010.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?