Bell et al v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
47
ORDER that 45 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; that Plaintiff's 46 Objection is OVERRULED; that Defendants' 25 and 30 motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff's § 1983 conditions of confinement, equal protection, and classification claims are GRANTED; that Plaintiff's challenge to the legality of his current incarceration is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that Plaintiff's challenge to the Alabama Community Notification Act ("ACNA") is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; that an appropriate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/9/2012. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DARRIUS BRYANT BELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOB RILEY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1076-MEF
ORDER
On May 31, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 45) in this
case. Plaintiff has an Objection. (Doc. # 46). After an independent review of the file in this
case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 45) is ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. # 46) is OVERRULED; and,
3.
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 25, 30) on Plaintiff’s
§ 1983 conditions of confinement, equal protection, and classification
claims are GRANTED;
4.
Plaintiff’s challenge to the legality of his current incarceration is
DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
and,
5.
Plaintiff’s challenge to the Alabama Community Notification Act
(“ACNA”) is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction.
An appropriate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this the 9 th day of July, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?